- - - - -

Another Supreme Court Appointment for Obama?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
25 replies to this topic

#1 Wino

Wino

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,891 posts
  • Location:Never, never land. I am all over the place.

Posted 25 September 2009 - 02:32 PM

Ruth Bader Ginsburg was hospitalized overnight for treatment of anemia. Seems anemia is a side effect of the chemotherapy she is receiving for her pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer is a hard cancer to beat. Let's hope the 76 year old justice can win this battle. Does anyone remember who was number two and three on the list behind Sonya Sotomayor?

#2 smoker

smoker

    Newbie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 252 posts

Posted 25 September 2009 - 03:23 PM

He should nominate Palin.

The hearings alone would be worth it.

#3 Wino

Wino

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,891 posts
  • Location:Never, never land. I am all over the place.

Posted 25 September 2009 - 07:02 PM

View Postsmoker, on 25 September 2009 - 03:23 PM, said:

He should nominate Palin.

The hearings alone would be worth it.
That would be a good show, but I don't think Sarah is a lawyer, is she?

#4 smoker

smoker

    Newbie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 252 posts

Posted 26 September 2009 - 10:42 AM

There's nothing in the Constitution that says you have to be a lawyer in order to be on the Supreme Court.

Given some of the decisions the current court has made I'd say that clowns, serial killers, car salesmen and Delta Burke might do a better job.

#5 Wino

Wino

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,891 posts
  • Location:Never, never land. I am all over the place.

Posted 26 September 2009 - 12:48 PM

View Postsmoker, on 26 September 2009 - 10:42 AM, said:

There's nothing in the Constitution that says you have to be a lawyer in order to be on the Supreme Court.

Given some of the decisions the current court has made I'd say that clowns, serial killers, car salesmen and Delta Burke might do a better job.
How right you are. Since there are no set rules or qualifications for a Supreme Court nominee, my ten year old nephew could sit on the court if nominated by the president and passed by the senate. That being said, I do not believe there has been a Supreme Court justice in our history that has not been a lawyer.

#6 WannaGo

WannaGo

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 500 posts

Posted 29 September 2009 - 12:21 AM

View Postsmoker, on 26 September 2009 - 10:42 AM, said:

There's nothing in the Constitution that says you have to be a lawyer in order to be on the Supreme Court.

Given some of the decisions the current court has made I'd say that clowns, serial killers, car salesmen and Delta Burke might do a better job.

Delta Burke was hot. Just sayin'.

#7 Beer Chang

Beer Chang

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,064 posts

Posted 29 September 2009 - 07:31 AM

View PostWannaGo, on 29 September 2009 - 12:21 AM, said:

Delta Burke was hot. Just sayin'.

Although all Supreme Court justices have been lawyers some have not been judges, Earl Warren being one example.

#8 smoker

smoker

    Newbie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 252 posts

Posted 29 September 2009 - 09:07 AM

I think the court needs more diversity. Seriously, being a lawyer is nice and all, but if it's all lawyers that really limits them.

I think adding someone like Michael Jordan who could bring a good jump shot or Jenna Bush who could teach them how to do Jager shots would balance things out.

#9 Wino

Wino

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,891 posts
  • Location:Never, never land. I am all over the place.

Posted 29 September 2009 - 12:16 PM

I think Bill Clinton or Al Gore might be a good choice.

#10 WannaGo

WannaGo

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 500 posts

Posted 30 September 2009 - 02:40 AM

Maybe Obama could appoint this guy...


Posted Image


...so Scalia can have some company.

#11 smoker

smoker

    Newbie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 252 posts

Posted 30 September 2009 - 07:09 AM

If he appointed Glenn Beck, Beck would shut up.

#12 Wino

Wino

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,891 posts
  • Location:Never, never land. I am all over the place.

Posted 02 October 2009 - 07:21 PM

View Postsmoker, on 30 September 2009 - 07:09 AM, said:

If he appointed Glenn Beck, Beck would shut up.
Don't count on it. The guy doesn't know when to shut up.

#13 WannaGo

WannaGo

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 500 posts

Posted 03 October 2009 - 02:52 AM

View PostWino, on 02 October 2009 - 07:21 PM, said:

Don't count on it. The guy doesn't know when to shut up.

If he ain't talking, he's bawling.

#14 CrazyExpat

CrazyExpat

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 427 posts

Posted 03 October 2009 - 11:37 AM

I think former President Clinton is a perfect choice for the nomination. Qualified and would add great charisma to the court.

#15 Beer Chang

Beer Chang

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,064 posts

Posted 03 October 2009 - 12:12 PM

View PostCrazyExpat, on 03 October 2009 - 11:37 AM, said:

I think former President Clinton is a perfect choice for the nomination. Qualified and would add great charisma to the court.

I agree.

And I think President Taft served on the Court after his term.

#16 Wino

Wino

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,891 posts
  • Location:Never, never land. I am all over the place.

Posted 03 October 2009 - 03:49 PM

View PostCrazyExpat, on 03 October 2009 - 11:37 AM, said:

I think former President Clinton is a perfect choice for the nomination. Qualified and would add great charisma to the court.
I would sure like to see this happen, although I don't believe Clinton would take the job. He is having too much fun doing what he does now. How about Al Gore?

#17 smoker

smoker

    Newbie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 252 posts

Posted 04 October 2009 - 09:56 AM

Clinton wouldn't take it.

Right now he gets to hang out in the cool part of Harlem and travel the world banging discreet chicks wherever he goes.

He'd never trade that for the type of non-media existence the Supreme Court demands.

#18 lvdkeyes

lvdkeyes

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,158 posts

Posted 04 October 2009 - 01:01 PM

Do you think he would risk the wrath of Hillary?

#19 Beer Chang

Beer Chang

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,064 posts

Posted 04 October 2009 - 01:01 PM

Woodward's book about the Supreme court was pretty good. Made Burger look like an idiot though.

#20 Wino

Wino

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,891 posts
  • Location:Never, never land. I am all over the place.

Posted 04 October 2009 - 02:48 PM

View Postlvdkeyes, on 04 October 2009 - 01:01 PM, said:

Do you think he would risk the wrath of Hillary?
I think after all these years and the crap he has done, Bill has Hillary very well trained.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users