Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize
#1
Posted 09 October 2009 - 10:24 AM
By KARL RITTER and MATT MOORE, Associated Press Writers Karl Ritter And Matt Moore, Associated Press Writers
OSLO – President Barack Obama won the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples," the Norwegian Nobel Committee said, citing his outreach to the Muslim world and attempts to curb nuclear proliferation.
#2
Posted 09 October 2009 - 10:25 AM
#4
Posted 09 October 2009 - 12:03 PM
#5
Posted 09 October 2009 - 12:09 PM
CrazyExpat, on 09 October 2009 - 12:03 PM, said:
#6
Posted 09 October 2009 - 12:32 PM
Wino, on 09 October 2009 - 12:09 PM, said:
I'd like to see more balls on this first term.
#7
Posted 09 October 2009 - 12:55 PM
This win for Obama was a real surprise to me.
I was hoping to get the nod this year . . . . oh well there is next year.
#8
Posted 09 October 2009 - 01:34 PM
[quote name='Wino' date='09 October 2009 - 05:24 PM' timestamp='1255083861' post='2101']
This win for Obama was a real surprise to me.
I was hoping to get the nod this year . . . . oh well there is next year.
[/quote]
Keep your chin up. Since you have been promoting peace and love for years, I am sure the committee will eventually come around to you.
#9
Posted 09 October 2009 - 01:56 PM
He got the award because his name isn't "George W. Bush."
But you know what, my name isn't George Bush either - where's my fucking Nobel?
#11
Posted 09 October 2009 - 03:31 PM
#12
Posted 09 October 2009 - 05:45 PM
CrazyExpat, on 09 October 2009 - 12:03 PM, said:
Ditto....and I'm a big Obama fan. But maybe (hopefully) this will be one case where he earns the award after he's already gotten it.
#13
Posted 10 October 2009 - 01:06 AM
#14
Posted 10 October 2009 - 06:33 AM
lvdkeyes, on 10 October 2009 - 01:06 AM, said:
#15
Posted 10 October 2009 - 08:59 AM
#17
Posted 10 October 2009 - 10:44 PM
smoker, on 10 October 2009 - 08:59 AM, said:
I could be wrong but I think he was only nominated then. But, same difference - it remains perplexing to my why he was either nominated or actually given the award.
#18
Posted 11 October 2009 - 11:51 PM
Sima Samar, women’s rights activist in Afghanistan: “With dogged persistence and at great personal risk, she kept her schools and clinics open in Afghanistan even during the most repressive days of the Taliban regime, whose laws prohibited the education of girls past the age of eight. When the Taliban fell, Samar returned to Kabul and accepted the post of Minister for Women’s Affairs.â€
Ingrid Betancourt: French-Colombian ex-hostage held for six years.
Dr. Denis Mukwege: Doctor, founder and head of Panzi Hospital in Bukavu, Democratic Republic of Congo. He has dedicated his life to helping Congolese women and girls who are victims of gang rape and brutal sexual violence.
Handicap International and Cluster Munition Coalition: “These organizations are recognized for their consistently serious efforts to clean up cluster bombs, also known as land mines. Innocent civilians are regularly killed worldwide because the unseen bombs explode when stepped upon.â€
Hu Jia, a human rights activist and an outspoken critic of the Chinese government, who was sentenced last year to a three-and-a-half-year prison term for ‘inciting subversion of state power.’
Wei Jingsheng, who spent 17 years in Chinese prisons for urging reforms of China’s communist system. He now lives in the United States.
#19
Posted 12 October 2009 - 01:35 AM
A year from now, giving him the prize would have had some legitimacy. This is one of those situations when people try to help, but only end up hurting.
On the other hand, I think I understand why the committee did it, and David Ignatius summed it up perfectly in the Washington Post:
That’s what he’s being honored for, really: reconnecting America to the world and making us popular again. If you want to understand the sentiments behind the prize, look at the numbers in the Transatlantic Trends report released last month by the German Marshall Fund. Obama’s approval rating in Germany: 92 percent compared to 12 percent for George Bush. His approval in the Netherlands: 90 percent compared to 18 percent for Bush. His favorability rating in Europe overall (77 percent) was much higher than in America (57 percent)...
...The Nobel committee is expressing a collective sigh of relief that America has rejoined the global consensus.
By the way Wino, I have to disagree about calling for troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan. They are two very different situations.
Afghanistan was a righteous war to begin with -- even if the previous administration totally fucked up the execution of it -- and is now one of those, 'you broke it, you bought it' deals. We have to stay in Afghanistan, help secure and rebuild the country and deny al-Qaeda a base from which to stage future attacks on the US and other nations. This isn't 'he has WMDs' bullshit...if we allow al-Qaeda and the Taliban to regain Afghanistan, then we will pay for it. IMHO.
#20
Posted 12 October 2009 - 11:40 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

This topic is locked









