Ted Kennedy's Senate Seat
#1
Posted 18 January 2010 - 05:54 AM
#2
Posted 18 January 2010 - 06:25 AM
#3
Posted 18 January 2010 - 09:13 AM
Wino, on 18 January 2010 - 05:54 AM, said:
#4
Posted 19 January 2010 - 06:16 AM
#5
Posted 19 January 2010 - 08:36 AM
#6
Posted 19 January 2010 - 10:44 AM
lvdkeyes, on 19 January 2010 - 08:36 AM, said:
Au contraire. If Obama and Clinton and others wouldn't have made these last ditch efforts, the polls reflected that she surely would have lost. We'll know tomorrow who wins/loses.
Rather difficult to explain how the same state that elected Teddy Kennedy so many times also would vote for either Romney or any Republican. But it's happened before and will happen again. Inexplicable to me as Massachusetts isn't generally thought of as a swing state.
#7
Posted 19 January 2010 - 03:59 PM
Wino, on 18 January 2010 - 05:54 AM, said:
#9
Posted 19 January 2010 - 05:07 PM
rucus7, on 19 January 2010 - 03:59 PM, said:
Correct. 60 votes to end a filibuster (debate) in the Senate (without the 60 votes to end it, nobody's voting on that bill ever). Presuming a filibuster is ended by 60+ votes, then the bill rises or falls on a majority vote (and, if it's 50/50, the President of the Senate - Joe Biden - gets to vote).
House rules are different and a simple majority can ultimately jam something through.
#10
Posted 20 January 2010 - 02:36 AM
#11
Posted 20 January 2010 - 02:46 AM
lvdkeyes, on 19 January 2010 - 08:36 AM, said:
Edit update FOX News report claims that Brown is the winner. Coakley has conceded.
#12
Posted 20 January 2010 - 03:11 AM
#13
Posted 20 January 2010 - 03:56 AM
#14
Posted 20 January 2010 - 04:30 AM
Brown, like other Republicans, say they want to include all Americans under health plans by doing it a "better" way. That "better" way, to them, is to do absolutely nothing at all to change anything of substance.
#15
Posted 20 January 2010 - 04:38 AM
#16
Posted 21 January 2010 - 07:31 AM
#17
Posted 21 January 2010 - 12:47 PM
Wino, on 21 January 2010 - 07:31 AM, said:
I'm with you, wino. Once in a while, I can look past my own pocketbook - and it's tragic that it's the "working poor" have no insurance and only ever see a doctor in the emergency room of a hospital.
#18
Posted 21 January 2010 - 01:10 PM
#19
Posted 22 January 2010 - 02:17 AM
Beer Chang, on 21 January 2010 - 01:10 PM, said:
#20
Posted 31 January 2010 - 11:15 AM
The USA health care lobbyists want all medicare dollars in their greedy little hands.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

This topic is locked









