State of Healthcare in the US
#21
Posted 09 February 2010 - 04:19 AM
#22
Posted 09 February 2010 - 05:54 AM
Wino, on 09 February 2010 - 04:19 AM, said:
That's correct. But COBRA is meant to be a convenient short term gap between jobs. Insurance that only lasts for 18 months needs to replaced because insurance that expires has limited value.
#23
Posted 09 February 2010 - 10:40 AM
Wino, on 09 February 2010 - 04:19 AM, said:
Yea, it's the same coverage but you pay for that coverage as if you were a single-payor (one person) policy - which is why the "Cobra" rate is so much more than what the employer paid.
#24
Posted 09 February 2010 - 12:06 PM
#25
Posted 10 February 2010 - 02:55 AM
#26
Posted 10 February 2010 - 03:17 AM
Wino, on 10 February 2010 - 02:55 AM, said:
If that's possible (other than the case where the insurance company providing the coverage chooses to allow continued coverage), I'm not aware of it.
One of the big issues in the current health care debate is that currently an insurance company can deny you coverage if you have any underlying condition that they don't want to insure. If somebody already has a heart issue or some cancer condition, they simply won't currently insure you (or they will take your money and exclude from coverage certain pre-existing conditions). A single insurance company shouldn't be forced to accept pre-existing conditions while other insurance companies won't do that - and, to cover anybody and to economically spread the risk, that's why the current legislation requires every insurance company to accept every applicant regardless of pre-existing conditions. Unfortunately, it currently looks like there will be no significant change in how the health insurance system works (badly in many cases) in the US.
#27
Posted 11 February 2010 - 10:53 AM
#28
Posted 11 February 2010 - 07:47 PM
#29
Posted 12 February 2010 - 04:37 AM
Help



















